Come join us for a free webinar tonight on the new media literacy of multitasking hosted by the amazing people at the New Media Literacies Project. Project NML defines the literacy of multitasking as:
the ability to scan one’s environment and shift focus as needed to salient details. Being a good multitasker is required in our new media landscape – and that includes learning when it isn’t good to multitask.
Here is a description of tonight’s webinar from Vanessa Vartabedian, New Media Literacies Community Manager:
Please join us this Thursday, September 23rd from 7-8:30 PM EST for this month’s webinar on the new media literacy multitasking. This session is centered around the debate of multitasking as a skill vs. distraction in relation to learning. It will provide an opportunity for participants to discuss the differences between multitasking, continuous partial attention, task-switching and the various other definitions that have come about to describe the ways in which we switch our attention from one thing to another faster and more frequently than ever. Whether you believe this can be a valuable skill in learning environments, or consider it a deterrent, one thing we know for sure is it’s not going away. Come contribute your experience, reflections and tips about this controversial skill in our 21st century classrooms, and explore how we might move beyond the debate and into useful practices.
This is the last in our series of webinars centered on specific NML skills. Next month on October 14th from 7-8:30 PM EST we will see each of the new media literacies in action as our Early Adopter Working Group of educators from the state of New Hampshire wrap-up a year-long professional development and share their reflections and expertise. See the full schedule here.
I’m very proud to have been one of the contributors to the Syracuse University Center for Digital Literacy e-book project, From the Creative Minds of 21st Century Librarians. Check out this free e-book that is available to everyone! Here is a brief overview of the text:
From the Creative Minds of 21st Century Librarians is CDL’s first e-book project made possible in part through an IMLS grant awarded to CDL in 2008 to update the AASL standards in the S.O.S. for Information Literacy database. This 275-page free downloadable resource contains dozens of lesson plans that implement AASL’s Standards for the 21st-Century Learner in the context of the curriculum. Contributing authors include more than 30 teacher-librarians. The book, edited by Marilyn P. Arnone, Ruth V. Small, and Barbara K. Stripling, was more than a year in the making and features a foreword by Barbara Stripling and graphic design by Marguerite Chadwick-Juner. If you are looking for creative ideas that target the standards to implement in your school library, this book will help you jumpstart the process. Download the publication and please pass on this link to your colleagues in the school library field.
Andy Woodworth and Nancy Dowd have written two cool blog posts that seem to be intersecting with two new policies I officially began implementing last Wednesday. Andy muses about the power of liberating information and removing barriers to access in libraries. Andy asserts the following:
Ease of access is not simply a convenience, but a necessary aspect for our patrons.
Nancy Dowd then goes on to muse on Andy’s post and wonders if we have failed to change by continuing to have “one size fits all” policies and plans in our libraries. Dowd maintains:
Valuing our customers requires us to go deeper than finding the right resources for them, it demands that we recognize what they want, need and desire and begin creating solutions that work for them and stop holding them captive to systems that meet our needs.
I thought of Valeria Maltoni’s “3 Steps to Mapping the Customer Journey” and how she encourages you to “innovate at each touch point” of customer service. In her blog post, she goes back to David Lee King’s question, “Who’s at the center of your processes, you or the customer?” She also points out that personalization is in. Nancy’s post also made me think of my principal, Dr. Bob Eddy, who is encouraging our faculty this year to embrace differentiation to do what is best for each individual student.
While I had not read Andy or Nancy’s blog posts before making two key policy changes this year, they reaffirm these decisions I have made for our library.
First, I am being more proactive and interactive to work with teachers who are assigning independent reading to extend loan periods from the standard two weeks to four weeks. In addition, I am encouraging students in their initial visit (whether with a class or on their own as they drop in) to let us know if they need extended time for a book checkout; as long as they can live with the extended time period we agree upon, then I am all for keeping them out of fine territory and helping them find a checkout period that works best for them!
The second policy change is about lunch visitor passes. In years past, we have required lunch passes for lunch visits to the media center. Students could qualify for a honor roll semester pass or a “good library citizen” semester pass; students could also get a “daily” pass right up through the first few minutes of each lunch period. While this system seemed to help create a happy balance between the needs of lunch visitors and scheduled classes, I always felt pangs of guilt that perhaps we were making access more difficult in the name of having some semblance of reasonable order even though we tried hard to make the pass system as accessible as possible.
I feel our upper classmen have a good idea of what we expect at lunch—we are fine with conversation, recreation, and collaboration as long as they are respectful of the needs of the students and classes around them. Because they have consistently demonstrated maturity, respect for others, and a willingness to help take ownership of the library and the privileges we try to give them (such as food and drink), I consulted with my library staff to see how they felt about doing away with the lunch passes. After we weighed the pros and cons of doing away with passes, we felt that the benefits outweighed the risks, so we are not requiring passes for lunch visitors during the month of August. If this trial period goes smoothly ( and so far it has), then I will happily retire the passes for the rest of the 2009-10 year if it means easier access for the students.
I feel these two changes will help create a more participatory environment and be more in line with the emphasis I am trying to place on customer service during 2009-10. What are you doing to remove barriers to your library? How are you making your services and information more accessible? What customized experiences and services could you offer your patrons in whatever library environment you are? Please share your ideas here as I am contemplating additional steps I can take to free up what my library has to offer!